arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

When Having Free Choice Is Harmful

Michael Ziegler et al.

Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie2025https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000453article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Decision-makers tend to commit to a course of action despite negative feedback ( escalating commitment), especially if they made the initial decision themselves. However, studies with repeated decisions have shown that this choice effect is unreliable. One explanation might be that simple-choice situations lead to less intensive elaboration of initial preferences. Therefore, in this experimental study, two choices of different complexity were introduced and their effects as well as the moderating effect of need for cognition (NFC) on escalation of commitment were analyzed. Participants ( N = 152) engaged in a stock market simulation game, managing a portfolio that was either assigned or freely chosen. After primarily negative feedback, participants repeatedly decided whether to keep or sell the portfolio. Overall, free choice resulted in longer holding periods, especially with complex choice. Furthermore, complex choice had a stronger effect on holding periods for participants with high NFC than for those with low NFC.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000453

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2025,
  title        = {{When Having Free Choice Is Harmful}},
  author       = {Michael Ziegler et al.},
  journal      = {Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000453},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When Having Free Choice Is Harmful

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.