arbiter
JournalsAccount

Third Country Bidders and Public Procurement in the European Union: Between Competition and Reciprocity

Alexandr Svetlicinii

Legal Issues of Economic Integration2026https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2026008article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article critically assesses the treatment of third country bidders in EU public procurement considering the recent developments in EU public procurement law, driven by evolving interpretations from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and revised guidance from the European Commission. These legal and policy shifts are examined considering their potential to advance two key policy objectives: enhancing competition within public procurement and expanding market access for EU bidders in third countries. The article evaluates the mechanisms designed to enforce reciprocity, including the International Procurement Instrument (IPI) and its emerging enforcement practices. The paper further investigates recent CJEU rulings that signal a departure from the long-standing practice of de facto equal treatment of third country bidders, suggesting a more assertive stance on reciprocity. Finally, the study considers the European Commission’s revised approach to third country bidders and assesses its likely impact on the declared policy objectives of market competition and reciprocity.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2026008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexandr2026,
  title        = {{Third Country Bidders and Public Procurement in the European Union: Between Competition and Reciprocity}},
  author       = {Alexandr Svetlicinii},
  journal      = {Legal Issues of Economic Integration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2026008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Third Country Bidders and Public Procurement in the European Union: Between Competition and Reciprocity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.