Green Interviews? The Influence of Explaining the Environmental Benefits of Video Interviews on Applicant Reactions

Johannes M. Basch & Lisa Kochendörfer

International Journal of Selection and Assessment2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70041article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The use of video interviews in personnel selection is increasing, yet less favorable applicant reactions to these interviews remain a concern among organizations. Alongside replicating prior findings, this study examines whether explaining the environmental benefits of video interviews can improve applicant perceptions. We investigate differences between synchronous (SVIs) and asynchronous video interviews (AVIs), focusing on fairness perceptions, organizational attractiveness, and interview motivation. Findings replicate that SVIs are generally perceived more favorably than AVIs, while explanations of environmental benefits can improve certain fairness perceptions and perceived organizational attractiveness. Additionally, pro‐environmental attitudes do not significantly moderate the effect of explanations. These results highlight the potential of environmental explanations in recruitment regardless of applicants' pro‐environmental attitudes.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70041

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{johannes2026,
  title        = {{Green Interviews? The Influence of Explaining the Environmental Benefits of Video Interviews on Applicant Reactions}},
  author       = {Johannes M. Basch & Lisa Kochendörfer},
  journal      = {International Journal of Selection and Assessment},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70041},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Green Interviews? The Influence of Explaining the Environmental Benefits of Video Interviews on Applicant Reactions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.