The court of theories: a debate-style exercise for teaching motivation theories

David Howe & Andrew T. Soderberg

Organization Management Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-06-2023-1891article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide an engaging debate-style exercise to be used by college-level instructors of management, organizational behavior or leadership courses. Design/methodology/approach This activity enables students to actively teach themselves benefits and drawbacks of four competing motivation theories: goal-setting theory, expectancy theory, equity theory and reinforcement theory. Findings This debate-style activity has proven useful in both engaging students and increases the depth of their understanding of motivation theories. Originality/value This exercise is an original exercise created by the authors to better teach the four theories of motivation.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-06-2023-1891

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2025,
  title        = {{The court of theories: a debate-style exercise for teaching motivation theories}},
  author       = {David Howe & Andrew T. Soderberg},
  journal      = {Organization Management Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-06-2023-1891},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The court of theories: a debate-style exercise for teaching motivation theories

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.