Does Social Interaction Mediate the Relationship Between Leisure Travel Participation and Loneliness Among People With Spinal Cord Injury?

Ruiping Ren et al.

Advances in Hospitality and Leisure2026https://doi.org/10.1108/s1745-354220260000021010book-chapter
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Loneliness is an increasingly recognized public health concern in the United States, particularly among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). While leisure travel has the potential to alleviate loneliness, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Given that leisure travel can also foster social interaction (SI), this study examined differences in SI and loneliness between active and inactive travelers with SCI and tested the mediating role of SI. Results indicated that inactive travelers reported significantly lower levels of SI and higher levels of loneliness compared to active travelers. Leisure travel participation was positively associated with SI (β = 2.43, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with loneliness (β = −0.85, p < 0.001). Additionally, SI was significantly correlated with lower loneliness scores (β = −0.08, p < 0.001), mediating 18.42% of the total effect. Findings highlight leisure travel’s role in enhancing SI and reducing loneliness among people with SCI.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1745-354220260000021010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ruiping2026,
  title        = {{Does Social Interaction Mediate the Relationship Between Leisure Travel Participation and Loneliness Among People With Spinal Cord Injury?}},
  author       = {Ruiping Ren et al.},
  journal      = {Advances in Hospitality and Leisure},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1745-354220260000021010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Does Social Interaction Mediate the Relationship Between Leisure Travel Participation and Loneliness Among People With Spinal Cord Injury?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.