Beyond Subsidies and Mandates: Testing a Simple Behavioral Mechanism to Drive Health Insurance Coverage

Wendy Netter Epstein et al.

American Law and Economics Review2026https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaf023article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Uninsured individuals face reduced access to care, financial risk, and higher mortality. Although public programs and private subsidies have lowered uninsurance, these mechanisms remain incomplete and politically unstable. We evaluate whether a low-cost outreach intervention can increase health insurance enrollment without altering plan prices. Using a randomized field experiment involving 16,477 uninsured Maryland households, we assigned households to a no-contact control or to receive email and postcard outreach featuring affordability messaging alone or combined with responsibility or community framings. Outreach increased qualified health plan enrollment by 0.699 percentage points and total coverage by 0.967 percentage points relative to control. The intervention produced one additional enrollment per $80 spent, implying an estimated cost per life saved of approximately $125,000—substantially below conventional valuations of a statistical life. The results demonstrate that inexpensive outreach can yield measurable welfare gains. Effects of moral framing are only suggestive for future research.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaf023

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wendy2026,
  title        = {{Beyond Subsidies and Mandates: Testing a Simple Behavioral Mechanism to Drive Health Insurance Coverage}},
  author       = {Wendy Netter Epstein et al.},
  journal      = {American Law and Economics Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaf023},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Beyond Subsidies and Mandates: Testing a Simple Behavioral Mechanism to Drive Health Insurance Coverage

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.