Neoliberalism’s apotheosis? Class, capital and the ideological development of the UK Labour Party’s planning reforms

Gareth Fearn

Town Planning Review2025https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2024.59article
AJG 2
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Planning reform is a central part of the new UK Labour government’s programme. This article shows how their proposed reforms draw upon a neoliberal problematisation of planning developed by several think tanks, where the planning system is seen as creating delay, as overly regulatory and as providing too much space for deliberation. The article shows that Labour draws on this problematisation while developing its own solutions through a series of institutional fixes as part of its turn towards ‘modern supply-side economics’. The article argues that the foregrounding of planning reform in Labour’s programme is an attempt to align the interests of rentier and finance capital with those of the new petite bourgeoisie. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 .

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2024.59

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gareth2025,
  title        = {{Neoliberalism’s apotheosis? Class, capital and the ideological development of the UK Labour Party’s planning reforms}},
  author       = {Gareth Fearn},
  journal      = {Town Planning Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2024.59},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Neoliberalism’s apotheosis? Class, capital and the ideological development of the UK Labour Party’s planning reforms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.