arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Limits of Information Capacity: Evidence From the French Napoleonic Cadaster

Anne Degrave

Comparative Political Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261418639article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

To what extent do large state investments in information capacity - legibility - promote fiscal revenue? I argue that in unstable political conditions, the effects of legibility may be limited to the local level. I analyze the French Napoleonic cadaster, an ambitious land survey designed to rationalize taxation following the 1789 revolution. The initially centralized process was decentralized after the fall of the Napoleonic empire in 1815. Exploiting variation in cadastral operations over forty years of implementation, I show that legibility did not increase fiscal revenue at the aggregate level, and even reduced it in the short run. In the long run, I find positive local effects of the centralized cadaster on fiscal revenue. Legibility also facilitated local public works and shifts in the management of communal land. The cadaster thus failed an instrument of broad fiscal reform but arguably strengthened the state’s reach at the local level.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261418639

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anne2026,
  title        = {{The Limits of Information Capacity: Evidence From the French Napoleonic Cadaster}},
  author       = {Anne Degrave},
  journal      = {Comparative Political Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261418639},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Limits of Information Capacity: Evidence From the French Napoleonic Cadaster

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.