Evaluating reactivity and promoting successful performance among teachers in the absence of a supervisor

Nicole M. Minard et al.

Journal of Organizational Behavior Management2026https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2026.2613882article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of self-monitoring and feedback with preschool teachers and the reactivity observed in a preschool classroom due to a supervisor’s presence. Preschool teachers’ positive interactions with students following the implementation of a self-monitoring and feedback procedure only slightly increased without the presence of a supervisor. Reactivity was identified with the presence of the supervisor as positive interactions and accurate reporting increased in the supervisor’s presence. Following the identification of reactivity, the researchers implemented a procedure to enhance stimulus control when a supervisor was absent. This procedure consisted of the supervisor providing feedback after supervisor-absent sessions. All teachers achieved the goal of demonstrating 60 positive interactions per session and positive interactions remained at high levels during maintenance conditions. Further, teachers engaged in higher reporting errors when a supervisor was not present in the classroom during the self-monitoring and feedback condition.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2026.2613882

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nicole2026,
  title        = {{Evaluating reactivity and promoting successful performance among teachers in the absence of a supervisor}},
  author       = {Nicole M. Minard et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Organizational Behavior Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2026.2613882},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evaluating reactivity and promoting successful performance among teachers in the absence of a supervisor

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.