Sampling inverse subordinators and subdiffusions

Ivan Biočić et al.

Annals of Applied Probability2026https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2250article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In this paper, a method to exactly sample the trajectories of inverse subordinators (in the sense of the finite-dimensional distributions), jointly with the undershooting or overshooting process, is provided. The method applies to general strictly increasing subordinators. The (random) running times of these algorithms have finite moments and explicit bounds for the expectations are provided. Additionally, the Monte Carlo approximation of functionals of subdiffusive processes (in the form of time-changed Feller processes) is considered where a central limit theorem and the Berry–Esseen bounds are proved. The approximation of time-changed Itô diffusions is also studied. The strong error, as a function of the time step, is explicitly evaluated demonstrating the strong convergence, and the algorithm’s complexity is provided. The Monte Carlo approximation of functionals and its properties for the approximate method is studied as well. An application of our algorithms in the context of weak ergodicity breaking of subdiffusion is also discussed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2250

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ivan2026,
  title        = {{Sampling inverse subordinators and subdiffusions}},
  author       = {Ivan Biočić et al.},
  journal      = {Annals of Applied Probability},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2250},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Sampling inverse subordinators and subdiffusions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.