Māori economies and wellbeing economy strategies: A cognitive convergence?

Matthew Rout et al.

Local Economy2024https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942251323559article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.43

What the paper says

This paper outlines an apparent ‘cognitive convergence’ occurring between the economic kaupapa (principles) of Māori (the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand) and wellbeing economy strategies (WES). Based on a broader project aimed at helping Māori develop economies of wellbeing, it details te ao Māori (the Māori worldview) and the economic kaupapa that emerge from this, and compares them to neoclassical capitalist principles. It then uses these kaupapa to examine the ontological alignment between the kaupapa and six WES: community wealth building, regenerative, common good, solidarity, doughnut, and wellbeing economics. There is significant alignment detected. The reason for this, the paper argues, is that these WES are tapping into a primordial view of the world, one that predates the current Western orientation: the relational worldview. This worldview is common across most Indigenous peoples including Māori and, it is proposed, also common for many who live and operate in the capitalist system. The paper concludes by noting that identifying the reason for this cognitive convergence might provide a coherence and unity to the various WES seeking to depose or alter the current capitalist system.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942251323559

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthew2024,
  title        = {{Māori economies and wellbeing economy strategies: A cognitive convergence?}},
  author       = {Matthew Rout et al.},
  journal      = {Local Economy},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942251323559},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Māori economies and wellbeing economy strategies: A cognitive convergence?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.43

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.31 × 0.4 = 0.12
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.