Carceral Diagonalism: The Punitive Safety Politics Linking Left and Right Transnational Anti-Gender Mobilizations

Sarah Lamble

Signs2026https://doi.org/10.1086/738987article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This article examines how carceral safety logics have driven cross-political, anti-transgender alliances within the global “anti-gender” movement. While anti-gender politics are typically associated with right-wing, nationalist, and religious conservatism, this article traces how “gender-critical” strands of feminism on the left have joined these mobilizations by reframing opposition to trans rights as protective measures for women. Through the concept of “carceral diagonalism,” the article explores how divergent political actors—across left, liberal, and right formations—are sutured together through a shared vision of safety that relies on the identification, exclusion, and punishment of perceived dangerous others. This framing positions trans people, particularly trans women, as threats to non-trans women and children to justify the blocking and rollback of gender-based rights. Drawing on Britain as a key example, the article shows how carceral logics enable unlikely alliances to converge through affectively charged safety narratives that mask deeper structural violences.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/738987

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sarah2026,
  title        = {{Carceral Diagonalism: The Punitive Safety Politics Linking Left and Right Transnational Anti-Gender Mobilizations}},
  author       = {Sarah Lamble},
  journal      = {Signs},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/738987},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Carceral Diagonalism: The Punitive Safety Politics Linking Left and Right Transnational Anti-Gender Mobilizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.