Signaling sequel success: How franchise characteristics shape the influence of brand consistency on movie sequel performance

Brandon Zachary Holle et al.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-026-01148-2article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Sequels abound in the entertainment industry. New sequels to movies, video games, and books are launched on a regular basis as a means to build on existing franchise brands and generate revenues for entertainment firms. This study leverages signaling theory to explain how the influence of brand consistency as a signal for movie sequels is contingent upon franchise characteristics, including franchise length, age, and origin. Using a sample of 466 movie sequels, this research empirically shows how brand consistency-box office revenue relationship depends on franchise characteristics. This research contributes to the entertainment marketing literature and provides important managerially relevant insights by highlighting how and when brand consistency improves sequel success.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-026-01148-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{brandon2026,
  title        = {{Signaling sequel success: How franchise characteristics shape the influence of brand consistency on movie sequel performance}},
  author       = {Brandon Zachary Holle et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-026-01148-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Signaling sequel success: How franchise characteristics shape the influence of brand consistency on movie sequel performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.