arbiter
JournalsAccount

Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants

Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi

International Migration Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261427389article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article explores how forced migrants in Italy come to adopt morally distancing and dehumanizing views toward fellow migrants, and how these ideological shifts are narratively justified through turning points. Drawing on longitudinal narrative interviews with 52 forced migrants in Italy conducted over six years (2019–2025), the study analyzes how moments of rupture — relational, institutional, aspirational, and symbolic — prompt migrants to reorganize moral evaluations and redefine group boundaries. Through a typology of corrective, disillusioning, and liberating turning points, the article shows how migrants reposition themselves in response to betrayal, exclusion, or the desire for civic recognition. Dehumanization emerges as a discursive strategy for asserting dignity and legitimacy under precarious conditions, rather than as a mere rhetorical excess. The study contributes to research on narrative, ideology, and migrant integration, and highlights the need for policy approaches that address the relational and moral dimensions of belonging.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261427389

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fabio2026,
  title        = {{Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants}},
  author       = {Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi},
  journal      = {International Migration Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261427389},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.