Foreign asset expropriation and sovereign bond ratings in the developing world

Glen Biglaiser et al.

Business and Politics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.42article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.46

What the paper says

Abstract Research shows that foreign asset expropriation narrows long-term bond spreads, resulting in lower borrowing costs. However, no empirical studies have investigated the effects of expropriation on sovereign bond ratings. Bondholders and sovereign bond issuers track ratings by credit rating agencies because they impact interest rates and capital costs. Using up to 59 developing countries from 1996 to 2016, we find that expropriation signals lower bond repayment, as asset confiscation blatantly violates international rule of law and discourages foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, reducing bond ratings. Mediation analysis also indicates that FDI and the rule of law mediate the relationship between expropriation and bond ratings. Further, we distinguish between direct and indirect expropriation and observe that direct expropriation has a greater probability of decreasing ratings. Our research suggests that expropriation holds economic consequences for developing countries, indicating how expropriation negatively affects sovereign bond issuers in the financial and investment community.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.42

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{glen2025,
  title        = {{Foreign asset expropriation and sovereign bond ratings in the developing world}},
  author       = {Glen Biglaiser et al.},
  journal      = {Business and Politics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.42},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Foreign asset expropriation and sovereign bond ratings in the developing world

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.