The Ottoman post-imperial migrations issue

Fuat Dündar

International Journal of Asian Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100655article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing body of scholarship that distinguishes post-colonial and post-imperial migrations from other forms of migration. However, because this literature largely excludes non-European cases, it remains predominantly Eurocentric. This review article seeks to demonstrate how these studies can be further enriched by incorporating Ottoman migrations ( muhacir ) as a distinct form of post-imperial migration. To this end, the article evaluates four recently published works on Ottoman migration: İpek’s Migration in the Imperial Territories (Memalik-i Şahanede Muhaceret) , Fratantuono’s Governing Migration in the Late Ottoman Empire , Hamed-Troyansky’s Empire of Refugees , and Oktay Özel’s Katamizes In Pursuit of the Blue (Kiske Kuşunun Peşinde Katamizeler) . Through a comparative analysis of these works, the article explores the potential contributions of Ottoman post-imperial migration studies to the broader literature on post-imperial migration. In particular, it addresses issues such as the role of official historiography in shaping migration histories; debates over whether migrants were framed as returnees or repatriates; the effects of different imperial structures; and the ethnic and religious composition of both host societies and migrant populations.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100655

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fuat2026,
  title        = {{The Ottoman post-imperial migrations issue}},
  author       = {Fuat Dündar},
  journal      = {International Journal of Asian Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100655},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Ottoman post-imperial migrations issue

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.