Addressing cartels in emerging markets: a critical analysis of legal implications and policy reforms

Soumyajit Sarkar et al.

International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbpim.2025.144071article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This study critically examines cartels and their legal ramifications within emerging markets. Employing a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology, we utilised the TCCM protocol to synthesise literature and conduct bibliometric keyword analysis. The study primarily focuses on the Competition Act, 2002, evaluating its efficacy in addressing deficiencies of the MRTP Act, 1969, and identifying gaps in the new legislation. Findings from selected papers are presented, along with proposed suggestions derived from each, offering insights into practical measures to mitigate the negative impact of cartels. Notably, the SLR contributes by evaluating the results of each paper, identifying gaps, and also highlighting practical deficiencies in the present research. It proposes solutions to address various hurdles associated with different types of cartels and enhance the understanding of regulatory challenges in emerging markets. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and researchers navigating complexities in cartel governance, contributing to the ongoing discourse.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbpim.2025.144071

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{soumyajit2025,
  title        = {{Addressing cartels in emerging markets: a critical analysis of legal implications and policy reforms}},
  author       = {Soumyajit Sarkar et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbpim.2025.144071},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Addressing cartels in emerging markets: a critical analysis of legal implications and policy reforms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.