How do SUMPs Consider Factors Influencing Walkability and Cyclability? A Review of Literature and Planning Tools

Silvia Rossetti

European Transport / Trasporti Europei2024https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.9review
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Improving active mobility in settlements is one of the EU's core objectives to improve people's quality of life. EU guidelines indicate Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) as strategic planning tools to achieve sustainable results through the definition of objectives and the provision of actions. Scientific research has extensively explored numerous factors in the built environment and active mobility infrastructures that influence mobility features and demands. However, a gap exists between research and urban plans employed to promote sustainable mobility. This paper examines whether these identified factors from scientific literature have implications for enhancing active mobility actions in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. First, a literature review highlights recurring factors in assessing active mobility networks. Then, an overview of actions supporting walkability and cyclability within Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans applied in the Emilia-Romagna Region in Italy is conducted. The two reviews comparison points out the expected implementation gap between research and practice.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{silvia2024,
  title        = {{How do SUMPs Consider Factors Influencing Walkability and Cyclability? A Review of Literature and Planning Tools}},
  author       = {Silvia Rossetti},
  journal      = {European Transport / Trasporti Europei},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How do SUMPs Consider Factors Influencing Walkability and Cyclability? A Review of Literature and Planning Tools

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.46 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.