arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Voices in clinical guideline development: a qualitative study of Irish guideline developers’ perspectives on developing recommendations

Waleed Serhan et al.

Evidence and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2025d000000073article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The study highlights the varied voices and social structures shaping the evidence to recommendation journey, with mechanisms to mitigate against dominance within guideline development processes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2025d000000073

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{waleed2026,
  title        = {{Voices in clinical guideline development: a qualitative study of Irish guideline developers’ perspectives on developing recommendations}},
  author       = {Waleed Serhan et al.},
  journal      = {Evidence and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2025d000000073},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Voices in clinical guideline development: a qualitative study of Irish guideline developers’ perspectives on developing recommendations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.