Who cares, and for what? Exploring the contents and extents of care as an analytical concept in ethnographies of electronics repair

Samwel Moses Ntapanta & Christian Medaas

Human Organization2025https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2025.2486612article
AJG 2
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Care in repairing is practiced, imagined, and experienced differently in various contexts. In this article we examine the role of care as a concept in the repair of consumer electronics. Our aim is to ethnographically explore the necessity of repair and the dynamics of repairing as they emerge in geopolitically polarized regions. To do so, we compare the repair of consumer electronics in Norway and Tanzania as two contrasting cases. Norway has the world’s highest per capita rate of consumption and disposal of consumer electronics. In contrast, due to Tanzania’s position within global techno-capitalism, Tanzanians are among those who consume the fewest consumer electronics per capita. We highlight the fluidity and ambiguity of the concept of care as it applies to repair practices in vastly disparate places. We further examine the benefits and limitations of employing the concept of care in such analyses, particularly in relation to the field of discard studies.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2025.2486612

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{samwel2025,
  title        = {{Who cares, and for what? Exploring the contents and extents of care as an analytical concept in ethnographies of electronics repair}},
  author       = {Samwel Moses Ntapanta & Christian Medaas},
  journal      = {Human Organization},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2025.2486612},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who cares, and for what? Exploring the contents and extents of care as an analytical concept in ethnographies of electronics repair

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.