“Human beings” as excluded subject matter for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)

Charles Lawson

Australian Intellectual Property Journal2009https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370173article
ABDC B
Weight
0.34

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review the meaning of "human beings" as it is used in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) . The analysis demonstrates that the meaning remains uncertain and that appeals to essential characters and taxonomic conceptions of "human beings" are not satisfactory. The article concludes that the existing qualitative test of what constitutes "essentially human characteristics" (that is not defeated by any technological means of how the "human being" is constituted or created), and the "unlikely to be ephemeral" standard in applying the "contrary to law" exclusion for post-patent grant exploitation limitations, are problematic.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370173

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charles2009,
  title        = {{“Human beings” as excluded subject matter for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)}},
  author       = {Charles Lawson},
  journal      = {Australian Intellectual Property Journal},
  year         = {2009},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370173},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“Human beings” as excluded subject matter for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.20 × 0.4 = 0.08
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.