arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Welfare Costs of Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Consumption Shocks

George M. Constantinides

Review of Asset Pricing Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaf002article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

I estimate the welfare benefits of eliminating idiosyncratic consumption shocks in the United States related (unrelated) to the business cycle as 36%–39% (lower than 1%) of household utility. Estimates of the former exceed earlier ones because I distinguish between idiosyncratic shocks related/unrelated to the business cycle, estimate the negative skewness of shocks, target moments of idiosyncratic shocks from household-level CEX data, and target market moments. Benefits of eliminating aggregate shocks are lower than 1% of utility. Policy should facilitate the insurance of idiosyncratic shocks related to the business cycle, such as job layoffs, with proof that individuals diligently seek suitable employment during periods of unemployment. (JEL D31, D52, E32, E44, G01, G12)

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaf002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{george2025,
  title        = {{Welfare Costs of Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Consumption Shocks}},
  author       = {George M. Constantinides},
  journal      = {Review of Asset Pricing Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaf002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Welfare Costs of Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Consumption Shocks

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.