Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information

David Swanlund et al.

Progress in Human Geography2026https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413610article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Numerous quantitative techniques exist for protecting geoprivacy, but often require significant expertise and may not always provide adequate protection. We propose cartographic privacy as a framework for protecting sensitive spatial data. Cartographically private approaches favor using design techniques to obfuscate data rather than statistical ones, appealing to intuitive rather than technical understandings of geoprivacy. We explore this concept using two case studies of sensitive geonarrative interviews that focus on mapping the topology and friction of trajectories described by participants, and in doing so protect geoprivacy. We conclude by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of qualitatively driven approaches to geoprivacy protection.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413610

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2026,
  title        = {{Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information}},
  author       = {David Swanlund et al.},
  journal      = {Progress in Human Geography},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413610},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.