arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Promoting IEP Participation

Megan Griffin

Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals2011https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728811410561article
ABDC C
Weight
0.60

What the paper says

Various interventions have been developed to promote student individualized education program (IEP) participation. Although they are generally endorsed by educators and researchers, critics argue that interventions to promote self-determination and IEP participation may be counter to the values of culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. This article reviews characteristics and results of 17 intervention studies grouped by experimental design and analyzes results for differential effects among CLD students. These studies documented the positive effects of interventions on student IEP participation, and a few documented positive results for CLD participants. This review also reveals limitations of the literature, particularly with respect to including CLD students and members of other underrepresented groups as participants. Implications are discussed for future research on interventions to promote student IEP participation.

28 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728811410561

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{megan2011,
  title        = {{Promoting IEP Participation}},
  author       = {Megan Griffin},
  journal      = {Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals},
  year         = {2011},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728811410561},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Promoting IEP Participation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.60

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.65 × 0.4 = 0.26
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.