Variable selection by searching for good subsets

J. H. Venter & Riaan de Jongh

South African Statistical Journal2023https://doi.org/10.37920/sasj.2023.57.1.4article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Machine learning and statistical models are increasingly used in a prediction context and in the process of building these models the question of which variables to include often arises. Over the last 50 years a number of procedures have been proposed, especially in the statistical literature. In this paper a newvariable selection procedure is introduced for linear models. A subset of variables is defined here to be “good at margin λ” if it has two properties, namely (i) its associated criterion of fit will be improved in relative terms by less than λ if any variable is added to it, and (ii) its criterion of fit will deteriorate in relative terms by at least λ if any variable inside it, is dropped from it. Thus, such a subset contains all variables that are individually important and none that are unimportant at a given margin λ ≥ 0. This paper discusses calculation of such λ-good subsets. The “good” approach extends readily to generalised linear and many other models by using an appropriate criterion of performance. The approach is illustrated on an artificial data set and a number of real data sets. Keywords: Good subsets, Linear regression, Logistic regression, Robust regression, Subset selection, Variable importance, Variable selection

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37920/sasj.2023.57.1.4

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{j.2023,
  title        = {{Variable selection by searching for good subsets}},
  author       = {J. H. Venter & Riaan de Jongh},
  journal      = {South African Statistical Journal},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37920/sasj.2023.57.1.4},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Variable selection by searching for good subsets

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.17 × 0.4 = 0.07
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.