Effectiveness of Sales Promotions on Vegetable Consumption Among Heterogeneous Consumer Groups: A Causal Forest Approach

Yuting Liu et al.

Journal of Consumer Affairs2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70041article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

A balanced diet with sufficient vegetable intake is vital for health, yet many in the US fall short of recommended levels. While the literature has extensively examined the effects of sales promotions, there is limited research addressing consumer heterogeneity in response to such promotions. We apply a machine learning approach that can uncover heterogeneity in promotional effects that conventional subgroup or regression‐based analyses are likely to miss. We find that in‐store price reductions boost vegetable consumption broadly. Households headed by young women with less formal education, larger households, low to mid‐level income households, and those that purchase vegetables less frequently are most responsive to price promotions. Conversely, middle‐aged and older, predominantly White households, households with more formal education, and higher incomes are less responsive. These findings suggest that targeted price promotions could be an effective tool to reduce health disparities by increasing vegetable consumption among populations most at nutritional risk.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70041

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yuting2026,
  title        = {{Effectiveness of Sales Promotions on Vegetable Consumption Among Heterogeneous Consumer Groups: A Causal Forest Approach}},
  author       = {Yuting Liu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Consumer Affairs},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70041},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Effectiveness of Sales Promotions on Vegetable Consumption Among Heterogeneous Consumer Groups: A Causal Forest Approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.