Addressing Organizational Cultural Conflicts in Engineering with Design Thinking

Sean M. Eddington et al.

Negotiation and Conflict Management Research2020https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12191article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.48

What the paper says

Abstract The present study examined how design thinking processes help to facilitate difficult conversations for fostering organizational change toward greater inclusion and equity in undergraduate engineering programs. Regardless of the type of organization or institution, sustainable diversity and inclusion integration requires difficult conversations that can correspond with locale‐specific interventions and deep cultural transformation. We led a series of design sessions with stakeholders from two undergraduate engineering programs at a large, Midwestern, research university aimed at creating prototype solutions to diversity and inclusion problems. Following the sessions, we conducted interviews with 19 stakeholders to understand their perceptions of the design process in facilitating both difficult conversations and in enacting meaningful change. Our study uncovered that organizational cultures impacted participants’ perceptions of change possibilities and their role in change. We conclude with recommendations for adopting design practices and communication‐as‐design processes to create structures and interactive approaches for facilitating conversations toward inclusionary organizational change.

16 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12191

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sean2020,
  title        = {{Addressing Organizational Cultural Conflicts in Engineering with Design Thinking}},
  author       = {Sean M. Eddington et al.},
  journal      = {Negotiation and Conflict Management Research},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12191},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Addressing Organizational Cultural Conflicts in Engineering with Design Thinking

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.33 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.