The ironic effect of entitlement: Giving behavior increases with entitled pursuit of information

Ilana Ritov & Stephen Garcia

Judgment and Decision Making2026https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2025.10027article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Willingness to help a needy person may depend on whether the person is perceived as responsible for their predicament. However, information regarding the cause is not always available, and people often ‘look the other way’ when it is. The present research explores whether potential donors choose to obtain information about the cause of the other’s need and, more importantly, how this choice to pursue information is affected by the donors’ feelings of entitlement. Across four studies, we find that decision makers who pursue information about why others are in need are more likely to offer help. Yet we also measure and manipulate the feelings of entitlement and find that those who are high in entitlement are more likely to seek the information regarding the person in need. Their higher tendency to pursue more information makes them more likely to help than they would otherwise.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2025.10027

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ilana2026,
  title        = {{The ironic effect of entitlement: Giving behavior increases with entitled pursuit of information}},
  author       = {Ilana Ritov & Stephen Garcia},
  journal      = {Judgment and Decision Making},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2025.10027},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The ironic effect of entitlement: Giving behavior increases with entitled pursuit of information

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.