Understanding midlife single women’s care as radical

Alison Lamont & Sonya Sharma

Feminist Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789251360609article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Single women’s lives are important but marginalised. The care that they do is meaningful and can be radical. In this article, we argue that within neoliberal patriarchal capitalism, radical care work is care that emerges from the margins, is self-and-other regarding and envisions change through maintenance and small acts. This definition draws insights from an emerging body of literature that uses the term ‘radical care’ to explore its potential in empirical studies of care and interview data with UK single women in midlife (37–62 years old), with and without children and experiences of romantic relationships. We develop the concept of radical care through a reflexive thematic analysis of accounts of care performed by these women. The decisions they make about their relationships are in part made by the care that those relationships enact, and single status allows rationalities of care to emerge which are not driven or defined by the pervasive ‘couple-norm’ that marginalises them. We argue that this kind of care work, governed by pursuit of a life that is meaningful and self-sustaining, is radical because it pushes against the neoliberal edicts of self-advancement and competition and instead centres relationality, survival and world-repair. By foregrounding the common yet marginal status of female singlehood in midlife, this article develops a vantage point that advances debates about radical care.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789251360609

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alison2025,
  title        = {{Understanding midlife single women’s care as radical}},
  author       = {Alison Lamont & Sonya Sharma},
  journal      = {Feminist Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789251360609},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding midlife single women’s care as radical

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.