Integrating eco-therapy into coaching psychology: A dual case study of grounding, meaning-making, and emergent agency
Valentina Canessa-Pollard
What the paper says
Introduction: Climate change is increasingly recognised not only as an environmental crisis but also as a source of psychological distress. Eco-therapy and coaching psychology offer promising, complementary approaches – but little research has explored their integration. This dual-case study examines the impact of eco-therapy-informed coaching on individuals experiencing climate-related emotional distress. Methods: Two participants each engaged in a single coaching session – one outdoors and one online – designed to address eco-emotional challenges. Both sessions incorporated nature-based and somatic practices, followed by a semi-structured interview. Results: Reflexive thematic analysis identified four key themes: (1) from disconnection to grounded presence, including embodied reconnection and emotional regulation; (2) meaning-making and personal agency through metaphor and imagery; (3) integration beyond the session, as participants adapted eco-therapeutic practices into daily life; and (4) constraints and complexities, including the need for emotional containment and psychologically safe engagement with climate-related emotions. Discussion: The sessions facilitated shifts from emotional overwhelm to grounded clarity, helping participants reconnect with their bodies, reflect on their values, and develop sustainable practices. Nature-based metaphors and embodied experiences served as powerful tools for insight and agency, though emotional intensity and the scale of climate distress remained key challenges. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the integration of eco-therapy and coaching psychology. While limited by a small, self-selecting sample, the findings suggest potential for wider application and highlight the need for trauma-informed practice and further research across diverse populations and contexts.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.