arbiter
JournalsAccount

Redwater's Continuing Impact on Canada's Energy Sector

Jassmine Girgis et al.

Alberta Law Review2025https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2808article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Ltd. (Redwater), ruling that environmental reclamation obligations were not claims provable in bankruptcy. This allowed the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to assert its claims outside the bankruptcy scheme, giving it priority over secured creditors and destabilizing Canada's energy and lending sectors. The decision disrupted commercial certainty as lenders struggled to recover loans from insolvent oil and gas companies. Although the AER and subsequent case law attempted to address the fallout, these measures have not fully restored stability. This article argues that comprehensive legislative action is needed to clarify the legal framework and mitigate Redwater's impact on the industry.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2808

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jassmine2025,
  title        = {{Redwater's Continuing Impact on Canada's Energy Sector}},
  author       = {Jassmine Girgis et al.},
  journal      = {Alberta Law Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2808},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Redwater's Continuing Impact on Canada's Energy Sector

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.