arbiter
JournalsAccount

Voting Power in the Council of the European Union: A Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysis

Dóra Gréta Petróczy & László Csató

Group Decision and Negotiation2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-026-09964-1article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The Council of the European Union (EU) is one of the main decision-making bodies of the EU. A number of decisions require a qualified majority, the support of 55% of the member states (currently 15) that represent at least 65% of the total population. We investigate how the power distribution based on the Shapley–Shubik index and the proportion of winning coalitions change if these criteria are modified within reasonable bounds. The power of the two countries, with approximately 4% of the total population each, is found to be almost flat. The decisiveness index decreases if the population criterion is above 68% or the states criterion is at least 17. Some quota combinations contradict the principles of double majority. The proportion of winning coalitions can be increased from 13.2% to 20.8% (30.1%) such that the maximal relative change in the Shapley–Shubik indices remains below 3.5% (5.5%). Our results are indispensable for evaluating any proposal to reform the qualified majority voting system.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-026-09964-1

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dóra2026,
  title        = {{Voting Power in the Council of the European Union: A Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysis}},
  author       = {Dóra Gréta Petróczy & László Csató},
  journal      = {Group Decision and Negotiation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-026-09964-1},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Voting Power in the Council of the European Union: A Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.