Evaluating Ethiopia’s Environmental Management Strategy: Does It Support Green Growth?

Seid Yimam et al.

Journal of Environment and Development2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251353430article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Ethiopia has pursued a manufacturing-led development strategy since the early 2000s, achieving substantial growth and poverty reduction. However, little attention is paid to the environmental costs of these results. Relying on the review of environmental policies and on 22 in-depth interviews with public and private stakeholders, we assess whether the existing command-and-control approach to environmental management is delivering on its promises, and whether there is scope for deploying environmental taxes. Our analysis demonstrates that, despite the implementation of a variety of regulatory measures, environmental management in Ethiopia is substantially ineffective. This is due to a combination of institutional instability, a lack of technical resources at the environmental protection authority, and to the low level of political priority of environmental protection. In this context, a switch to a market-based approach to environmental management would be ineffective, as the lack of political will to enforce environmental regulations is the real issue.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251353430

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{seid2025,
  title        = {{Evaluating Ethiopia’s Environmental Management Strategy: Does It Support Green Growth?}},
  author       = {Seid Yimam et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Environment and Development},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965251353430},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evaluating Ethiopia’s Environmental Management Strategy: Does It Support Green Growth?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.