Communication as an enabler of evidence-informed policy: a study on spatial planning

Maria Chiara Cattaneo & Martino Mazzoleni

Journal of Public Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x26100993article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Expert-produced information and data hold significant potential for adoption by decision-makers; however, this potential can be compromised by barriers related to language, communication channels, and formats. The literature emphasizes the differing languages, timelines, and incentives between specialists and lay decision-makers who seek practical solutions to real-world issues, rather than theoretical dilemmas. We conducted a mixed-method study, based on a survey and interviews with Italian regional lawmakers and local decision-makers in land-use planning. This is an area characterized by high levels of technicality and hence appears challenging to most decision-makers. We discovered that when they easily grasp the meaning and implications of policy documents, their understanding seems more influential in their legislative behavior. Consequently, a key challenge in promoting evidence-informed policy-making seems to translate expert knowledge into accessible languages and codes for laypeople and to present it in practical and concise ways.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x26100993

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maria2026,
  title        = {{Communication as an enabler of evidence-informed policy: a study on spatial planning}},
  author       = {Maria Chiara Cattaneo & Martino Mazzoleni},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x26100993},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Communication as an enabler of evidence-informed policy: a study on spatial planning

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.