Exploring leadership competencies and leadership styles in the construction industry: an Australian context

Xiaohua Jin et al.

Construction Innovation2026https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-07-2025-0316article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose Good leadership is a fundamental critical factor in ensuring success of construction projects. This study aims to establish relationships between leadership competencies and leadership styles in the Australian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach Data were obtained through the administration of questionnaire surveys from 101 project management practitioners. There was testing of hypotheses of interrelationships between key constructs using multiple linear regression. Findings Leadership styles and competencies varied depending on the context in which leadership operated. However, results indicated that significant level of similarities are present in leadership of building sectors and project sizes. Originality/value Findings provide multi-sectorial guide for project management practitioners in developing and monitoring leadership styles and competencies in the construction industry.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-07-2025-0316

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xiaohua2026,
  title        = {{Exploring leadership competencies and leadership styles in the construction industry: an Australian context}},
  author       = {Xiaohua Jin et al.},
  journal      = {Construction Innovation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-07-2025-0316},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring leadership competencies and leadership styles in the construction industry: an Australian context

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.