arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

What We Are to ‘Marginalized Groups’: Advocacy CSOs’ Constructions of Their Legitimacy in Jharkhand, India

Margit van Wessel & Yogesh Mishra

Progress in Development Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251351081article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study explores the way Indian civil society organizations (CSOs) in the state of Jharkhand that work from rights-based approaches construct the legitimacy of their advocacy roles regarding marginalized groups. Finding that they typically do so from a stance of solidarity, the article shows that solidarity in this context supports access to rights and entitlements, but can be delimited in terms of its emancipatory quality. The article identifies these limits, discussing the position of superiority that is often taken, the limited engagement with constituency perspectives and leadership that can be found, and a negotiated positioning that seeks to harmonize organizational, constituency and state interests. The implication is that CSOs’ solidarity through rights-based approaches needs close examination rather than flat-out embracement as the mainstay of legitimate CSO advocacy.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251351081

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{margit2025,
  title        = {{What We Are to ‘Marginalized Groups’: Advocacy CSOs’ Constructions of Their Legitimacy in Jharkhand, India}},
  author       = {Margit van Wessel & Yogesh Mishra},
  journal      = {Progress in Development Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251351081},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What We Are to ‘Marginalized Groups’: Advocacy CSOs’ Constructions of Their Legitimacy in Jharkhand, India

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.