When practice and research meet: demonstration of a practice research methodology in co-producing an assessment tool

Ebenezer Cudjoe et al.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology2026https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2625170article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Practice research is a meeting point between practice and research involving collaborations and negotiations to ensure findings from research are usable to improve services and living conditions. It is still embryonic and can be challenging for novice researchers or experienced researchers without adequate understanding. For social science researchers and practitioners who are interested in improving service delivery and shaping positive outcomes, practice research methodology is a go-to approach. However, there is inadequate clarity about how core theoretical foundations of practice research are represented in the methodology. In this article, we demonstrate the application of a practice research methodology in the co-production of an assessment tool for social workers in Ghana. While our case study focused on the production of knowledge within social work practice, the principles and theories of practice research are applicable to other cognate social sciences disciplines where an aim is to produce knowledge usable in practice.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2625170

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ebenezer2026,
  title        = {{When practice and research meet: demonstration of a practice research methodology in co-producing an assessment tool}},
  author       = {Ebenezer Cudjoe et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2026.2625170},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When practice and research meet: demonstration of a practice research methodology in co-producing an assessment tool

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.