On Democratic Organizing and Organization Theory

Julie Battilana et al.

Administrative Science Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392251322430article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.64

Abstract

As threats to democracy endanger the rights and freedoms of people around the world, scholars are increasingly interrogating the role that organizations play in shaping democratic and authoritarian societies. Just as societies can be more or less democratic, so, too, can organizations. This essay, in honor of ASQ ’s 70th volume, argues for a deeper focus in organizational research on the extent to which organizations themselves are democratic and the outcomes associated with these varied models of organizing. First, we provide a framework for considering the extent to which organizations are democratically organized, accounting for the varied ways in which workers can participate in their organizations. Second, we call for research on the outcomes associated with democratic organizing at both the organizational and societal levels. We build from research arguing that the extent to which workers participate in organizational decision making can spill over to impact their expectations of and participation in civic life. Moving forward, we argue it is critical to recognize that questions of democracy and authoritarianism concern not only the political contexts in which organizations are embedded but also how organizations themselves are structured and contribute to society.

19 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392251322430

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{julie2025,
  title        = {{On Democratic Organizing and Organization Theory}},
  author       = {Julie Battilana et al.},
  journal      = {Adm.~Sci.~Q.},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392251322430},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On Democratic Organizing and Organization Theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.64

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.68 × 0.4 = 0.27
M · momentum0.97 × 0.15 = 0.15
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.