Student academic performance: the influence of peers’ problem behaviors and moderating effect of educational expectation

Sujie Peng & Chenying Zeng

Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences2025https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-05-2025-0089article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of peers’ problematic behaviors on students’ academic performance, considering potential moderating effects based on students’ educational expectations. Design/methodology/approach We utilized data from the China Education Panel Survey (CEPS) to assess the suggested measurements, such as the number of participants’ close friends with problem behaviors, using regression models. Findings Grounded in problem behavior theory (PBT) and expectancy-value theory (EVT), the findings suggest that peers’ problem behaviors impact academic performance. Students’ expectations exacerbate class-skipping effects, lessen fighting effects, but do not affect dropout impacts. Originality/value This study provides several main contributions. For instance, it offers new insights by examining how students’ educational expectations may moderate these effects. At the study’s conclusion, practical implications for practitioners and policymakers are outlined, along with addressing the study’s limitations.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-05-2025-0089

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sujie2025,
  title        = {{Student academic performance: the influence of peers’ problem behaviors and moderating effect of educational expectation}},
  author       = {Sujie Peng & Chenying Zeng},
  journal      = {Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-05-2025-0089},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Student academic performance: the influence of peers’ problem behaviors and moderating effect of educational expectation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.