Forming the benefit-oriented official assistance: Cross-country analysis

CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation et al.

Applied Econometrics2024https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2024-74-124-143article
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

We examine cross-country differences in the beneficent motive formation of aid to developing countries using data on 18 OECD donors for 2010–2019. The paper tested the theoretical determinants highlighted in the philosophy of collaboration on two subsamples of donors — those with a prevailing selfless motive and those with a mixed one. Our analysis shows that for the first group of countries, welfare and prosociality are significant factors of benefit-oriented aid, for the second — technological development. The components of civic culture, such as tolerance, trust, and public involvement in political decisions probably play a significant role regardless of the donor type . In addition, the paper explored key distinctions in the relationship between domestic and international aid. The results obtained expand the understanding of the cultural and historical contexts of untying aid, which remains one of the central tasks of the OECD.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2024-74-124-143

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cemi2024,
  title        = {{Forming the benefit-oriented official assistance: Cross-country analysis}},
  author       = {CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Econometrics},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2024-74-124-143},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Forming the benefit-oriented official assistance: Cross-country analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.