AI Generated Customised Pricing: Promises and Pitfalls
Janek Ratnatunga
What the paper says
The potential benefits of AI-driven pricing are clear. By utilising detailed data analytics, industries like the airline industry can optimise their revenue streams, ensuring that each seat is priced according to real-time market conditions and individual willingness to pay. This not only maximises profitability but also allows for dynamic pricing strategies that can adapt to ever-changing consumer behaviours and external factors. However, as with any technological advancement, the deployment of AI in pricing strategies is not without its challenges. Concerns about privacy, data security, and potential bias in algorithmic decision-making must be addressed proactively. Industries experimenting with AI based targeted pricing must commit to ethical AI practices, ensuring that their systems are transparent and free from discrimination. This involves regular audits, updates, and the implementation of comprehensive compliance mechanisms that align with legal standards and consumer expectations. Moreover, transparency and consumer education are vital. For example, in the airline industry, passengers must be informed about how AI influences pricing and the benefits it brings to their travel experience. Clear communication can help mitigate concerns and foster trust, ensuring that consumers feel comfortable and confident in the airline's pricing practices. Finally, collaboration with regulatory bodies and industry groups will be essential in shaping the future landscape of AI-driven pricing. By working together, airlines, regulators, and technology providers can establish guidelines that protect consumers while allowing for continued innovation and growth. This paper uses the pricing practises being tested in the airline industry to consider the promises and pitfalls of AI generated customised pricing.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.