← Back to results Structural Econometrics of Auctions: A Review Matthew Gentry et al.
What the paper says We review the literature concerned with the structural econometrics of observational data from auctions, discussing the problems that have been solved and highlighting those that remain unsolved as well as suggesting areas for future research. Where appropriate, we discuss different modeling choices as well as the fragility or robustness of different methods.
2 citations
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000031 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{matthew2018,
title = {{Structural Econometrics of Auctions: A Review}},
author = {Matthew Gentry et al.},
journal = {Foundations and Trends in Econometrics},
year = {2018},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000031},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Structural Econometrics of Auctions: A Review
AU - al., Matthew Gentry et
JO - Foundations and Trends in Econometrics
PY - 2018
ER - Matthew Gentry et al. (2018). Structural Econometrics of Auctions: A Review. *Foundations and Trends in Econometrics*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000031 Matthew Gentry et al.. "Structural Econometrics of Auctions: A Review." *Foundations and Trends in Econometrics* (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000031. Structural Econometrics of Auctions: A Review
Matthew Gentry et al. · Foundations and Trends in Econometrics · 2018
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000031 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.08 × 0.4 = 0.03 M · momentum 0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.