arbiter
JournalsAccount

Novice risk work: How juniors coaching seniors on emerging technologies such as generative AI can lead to learning failures

Katherine C. Kellogg et al.

Information and Organization2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100559article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Historically, junior professionals have mentored senior professionals around new technologies, because juniors are typically more willing than seniors to perform lower-level tasks to learn new skills, better able than seniors to engage in real-time experimentation close to the work itself, and more willing than seniors to learn innovative methods that conflict with traditional identities and norms. However, we know little about what happens when emerging technologies have a high level of uncertainty in their use, because they have wide-ranging capabilities and are exponentially changing. With the rise of Artificial Intelligence, specifically learning algorithms and LLMs, such contexts may be increasingly common. In our study conducted with the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm, we interviewed 78 junior consultants in July–August 2023 who had recently participated in a field experiment that gave them access for the first time to generative AI (GPT-4) for a strategic business problem solving task. Drawing from junior professionals' in situ reflections soon after the experiment, we found that junior professionals may fail to manage risks around uncertain emerging technologies because juniors are likely to recommend three kinds of novice risk work tactics that: 1) are grounded in a lack of deep understanding of technologies that have uncertain and wide-ranging capabilities and are changing exponentially, 2) focus on change to human routines rather than system design, and 3) focus on interventions at the project-level rather than system deployer- or ecosystem-level. The implications of novice risk work are that, when junior professionals are expected to be a source of expertise in the use of uncertain, emerging technologies, this can lead to learning failures. This study contributes to our understanding of occupational learning around emerging technologies, risk work in organizations, and human-computer interaction. • Junior professionals may fail to be a source of expertise for seniors in GenAI use. • Juniors' focus on human routines and project-level work fails to manage novel risks. • GenAI risk work must target developers and system deployers in addition to users. • And it must target data, models, and infrastructure in addition to human routines. • GenAI requires system-level intervention for most effective organizational use.

6 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100559

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{katherine2025,
  title        = {{Novice risk work: How juniors coaching seniors on emerging technologies such as generative AI can lead to learning failures}},
  author       = {Katherine C. Kellogg et al.},
  journal      = {Information and Organization},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100559},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Novice risk work: How juniors coaching seniors on emerging technologies such as generative AI can lead to learning failures

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.44 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.