arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Conceptualizing Echo Chambers and Information Cocoons: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Future Directions

Jiaying Liu et al.

Journal of Strategic Information Systems2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101904review
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.57

What the paper says

Echo Chambers and Information Cocoons have become the subject of a multifaceted academic debate – ranging from the proper conceptualization and delineation of related concepts, to questions about their prevalence and uniqueness in the online environment, to arguments about their societal impact and the role of digital technologies. This study presents a systematic literature review that analyzes the existing research to synthesize relevant findings and build the missing foundations of these phenomena. This study follows a hermeneutic analytical approach to the literature to clarify and model the distinction between information cocoons and echo chambers. Furthermore, we summarize the selected literature and identify existing knowledge gaps to outline future research opportunities.

11 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101904

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jiaying2025,
  title        = {{Conceptualizing Echo Chambers and Information Cocoons: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Future Directions}},
  author       = {Jiaying Liu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Strategic Information Systems},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101904},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Conceptualizing Echo Chambers and Information Cocoons: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Future Directions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.57

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.57 × 0.4 = 0.23
M · momentum0.78 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.