arbiter
JournalsAccount

Diverse roles and perceptions of public officials and NGOs in local citizens’ assemblies – A comparative analysis of the cases of Poland and Hungary

Paulina Pospieszna et al.

Local Government Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2025.2481390article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

This article explores the roles and perceptions of public officials and NGOs in climate-related citizens’ assemblies (CAs) organised at the local level in Poland and Hungary. Through in-depth interviews with these actors, we investigate how process design and their involvement shape their views on CAs. In a comparative analysis of two local cases in Poznań and Budapest, we apply Bussu and Fleuß (2023) framework to examine key differences in the initiation, implementation, and impact of these assemblies. Our findings reveal that the degree of involvement in agenda-setting significantly influences actors’ perceptions, with civil society actors expressing more positive views when they are more involved, while public officials tend to view the recommendations with scepticism, particularly when they perceive them as challenges to their authority. This study contributes to understanding the role and potential of deliberative instruments in strengthening local democracy in CEE countries.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2025.2481390

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paulina2025,
  title        = {{Diverse roles and perceptions of public officials and NGOs in local citizens’ assemblies – A comparative analysis of the cases of Poland and Hungary}},
  author       = {Paulina Pospieszna et al.},
  journal      = {Local Government Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2025.2481390},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Diverse roles and perceptions of public officials and NGOs in local citizens’ assemblies – A comparative analysis of the cases of Poland and Hungary

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.