arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Effectiveness of Accruals Manipulation Measures: International Evidence

Junjun Liu & Maria Rykaczewski

Journal of International Accounting Research2026https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-056article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study examines the ability of abnormal accruals measures to capture earnings manipulation in international settings. Variations in accrual recognition are common in international settings due to differences in reporting standards and institutional features. Moreover, data availability imposes significant constraints on sample sizes in international research examining accruals. Thus, we evaluate how well abnormal accruals measures capture earnings manipulation under alternative model specifications that maximize sample sizes. We demonstrate that sales growth can reliably replace employee growth in the estimation of abnormal accruals, thereby alleviating employee data constraints for non-U.S. firms. Our study shows that the Dechow, Hutton, Kim, and Sloan (2012) and modified Larson, Sloan, and Zha Giedt (2018) models are most consistent in capturing earnings manipulation across international samples. Additional analysis indicates that the effectiveness of accruals manipulation measures is consistent across commonly used databases: Worldscope, Compustat, and Osiris. JEL Classifications: M41; G14.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-056

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{junjun2026,
  title        = {{The Effectiveness of Accruals Manipulation Measures: International Evidence}},
  author       = {Junjun Liu & Maria Rykaczewski},
  journal      = {Journal of International Accounting Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-056},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Effectiveness of Accruals Manipulation Measures: International Evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.