Earnings management in Brazil (2000-2025): synthesis, evidence, and research agenda

Antonio Lopo Martinez

Accounting & Finance Journal / Revista Contabilidade & Finanças2026https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x2026100-2.enarticle
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT This article offers a systematic, analytical, and narrative review of earnings management research in Brazil from 2000 to 2025. It integrates methods, findings, and mechanisms with an emphasis on the role of the Accounting & Finance Review (A&FR) and the formulation of a 2026-2030 agenda guided by credible identification, replicability, and regulatory utility. The methodology involved searching SciELO, SPELL, Google Scholar, and the CAPES Portal (PT/EN) for empirical studies focused on Brazil that used quantitative proxies (e.g., accruals, real activities, earnings quality, and earnings distribution). Screening was performed in two stages, with coding by thematic axes [International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), governance/auditing, accounting-tax, and sectoral/ownership] and proxy families (Jones/Kothari, Dechow-Dichev/McNichols, Roychowdhury, and hybrid/AI). A narrative summary was supported by a timeline and tables. Research gaps include limited causal evidence specific to norms (IFRS 15/16/17), an incomplete understanding of governance and audit mechanisms [committees, sector specialization, and American depositary receipts (ADRs)], the integration of text and numbers with interpretability, the micro-impacts of digital transformation [enterprise resource planning (ERP), continuous auditing, and smart contracts], and the effects of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) on the accounting and tax link. The results indicate that, on average, convergence with IFRS is associated with a moderate reduction in accruals-based management conditioned by governance, auditing (Big Four), and enforcement. There are also signs of substitution for real activities under greater accounting scrutiny. Abnormal book-tax differences (BTDs) and low tax-accounting compliance are related to lower earnings persistence and higher informational risk. The A&FR standardized protocols, aligned designs with Brazilian specifics, and connected results to regulatory issues. The article consolidates best practices, such as sector benchmarks, fixed effects, clustering, and sensitivity tests, and proposes a 2026-2030 agenda with five focus areas: accruals-real trade-offs, specific IFRS, governance and audit mechanisms, text and numbers integration, and digital transformation. The relevance of the topic lies in its useful synthesis for researchers (a map of validity and gaps), regulators and auditors (prioritization of oversight), and information users (warning signs). By integrating 25 years of evidence into a unified explanatory framework, the study reorganizes the field by clarifying the channels, conditions, and limits of management, standardizes protocols for the Brazilian context, and defines high-return priorities for 2026-2030. This reinforces the cumulative nature of the literature and brings the national debate closer to international standards.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x2026100-2.en

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{antonio2026,
  title        = {{Earnings management in Brazil (2000-2025): synthesis, evidence, and research agenda}},
  author       = {Antonio Lopo Martinez},
  journal      = {Accounting & Finance Journal / Revista Contabilidade & Finanças},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x2026100-2.en},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Earnings management in Brazil (2000-2025): synthesis, evidence, and research agenda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.