Streaming for good: Streamer‐viewer interaction, beneficiary focus, and donation progress

Shaojung Sharon Wang

Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing2024https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1849article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study explores how perceived viewer–streamer interactions elicit various types of social support in charity streaming, based on parasocial interaction (PSI). It further integrates accountability and goal‐setting theories to address the question of how the different types of beneficiary focus and levels of donation progress that are usually embedded in charity streaming settings harness PSI's effects to increase donations. Experiment 1 ( N = 100) showed that high PSI (vs. low) contributed to higher intentions from viewers to provide emotional and financial support to the streamers. Experiment 2 ( N = 241) demonstrated that viewers who experienced high PSI (vs. low) were more likely to purchase product and donate to the charity that benefits human (vs. animal and environment). Experiment 3 ( N = 315) found that high PSI (vs. low) and donation progress close (vs. far) to the goal were more likely to evoke donation to the human (vs. environment)‐focused charity. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1849

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shaojung2024,
  title        = {{Streaming for good: Streamer‐viewer interaction, beneficiary focus, and donation progress}},
  author       = {Shaojung Sharon Wang},
  journal      = {Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1849},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Streaming for good: Streamer‐viewer interaction, beneficiary focus, and donation progress

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.49 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.