Inequality in Child Mortality Persists Between Generations in the Netherlands, 1835–1919

Ingrid K. van Dijk

European Review of Economic History2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/heaf019article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In historical the Netherlands, child mortality was distributed unequally between families and this inequality persisted across generations. Using family reconstitution data for the province of Zeeland (LINKS) containing over 200,000 children born 1835–1914, I show that mortality was higher among children under age 5 whose parents lost siblings under age 5. Intergenerational persistence was strongest from mothers to their children and particularly for mothers who lost siblings as infants in relation to mortality among their own infants. This intergenerational persistence of child mortality existed independently from socioeconomic differences in infant and child mortality. Inequalities accumulated, as child mortality was highest for low socioeconomic status (SES) children whose parents originated from high-mortality, low-SES families. Intergenerational transmission in child mortality persisted even when child mortality had declined in the early twentieth century.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/heaf019

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ingrid2025,
  title        = {{Inequality in Child Mortality Persists Between Generations in the Netherlands, 1835–1919}},
  author       = {Ingrid K. van Dijk},
  journal      = {European Review of Economic History},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/heaf019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Inequality in Child Mortality Persists Between Generations in the Netherlands, 1835–1919

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.