arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

IMPACTS OF THE ECONOMIC COOPERATION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON BANKING COST EFFICIENCY IN CHINA AND TAIWAN : A STOCHASTIC METAFRONTIER APPROACH

Yung Lieh Yang et al.

Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics2017https://doi.org/10.15057/28951article
ABDC B
Weight
0.38

What the paper says

This study extends the stochastic metafrontier model (SMF) of Huang, Huang and Liu (2014) to compare the meta-cost banking efficiency in China and Taiwan from 2007 to 2013, and to analyze the impacts on cost efficiency following the implementation of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA).The empirical tests show that the banking sectors in both China and Taiwan implemented distinct technology-related policies during this period. Following the implementation of ECFA, the meta-cost efficiency for Taiwanʼs banking sectors showed a distinct improvement. Besides, the Chinese banks which had established branches in Taiwan experienced a significant enhancement in meta-cost efficiency. Several managerial insights and implications are discussed.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/28951

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yung2017,
  title        = {{IMPACTS OF THE ECONOMIC COOPERATION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON BANKING COST EFFICIENCY IN CHINA AND TAIWAN : A STOCHASTIC METAFRONTIER APPROACH}},
  author       = {Yung Lieh Yang et al.},
  journal      = {Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2017},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/28951},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

IMPACTS OF THE ECONOMIC COOPERATION FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON BANKING COST EFFICIENCY IN CHINA AND TAIWAN : A STOCHASTIC METAFRONTIER APPROACH

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.10 × 0.4 = 0.04
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.